oracles.ink

API3 vs Chronicle

API3 (First-party oracles with built-in OEV recapture ) versus Chronicle (Gas-efficient, fully verifiable oracle born inside MakerDAO ) — how they differ on type, coverage and what they’re built for.

API3Chronicle
TypePush + OEVPush
Update modelData providers run their own Airnode (no middlemen). The OEV Network auctions the value of each oracle update back to the dApp instead of leaking it to searchers.Scribe: Schnorr signature aggregation decouples validator count from verification cost, so updates stay cheap as the validator set grows.
ChainsMany EVM L2sEthereum + L2s
FeedsdAPIs160+
SecurityFirst-party provenance (data signed at source) + API3 DAO governance.Transparent validator set with cryptographic (Schnorr) aggregation; every update is independently verifiable.
TVS*Specialized~$7.5B
TokenAPI3
Best atFirst-party data + OEV recapture — turns oracle-update MEV leakage into protocol revenueLowest gas cost in the market (≈63% cheaper than Chainlink on Ethereum), with a strong RWA / institutional focus

* Approximate total value secured — dated market snapshot (DefiLlama / provider reports, 2026).

API3

  • Removes data middlemen (first-party)
  • OEV returns value to the protocol
  • Transparent data provenance
  • Smaller TVS / adoption
  • Fewer feeds than the top providers

Chronicle

  • Cheapest on-chain updates (Schnorr aggregation)
  • Fully transparent and verifiable
  • Institutional pedigree (Maker/Sky)
  • Smaller feed catalogue than Chainlink/Pyth
  • Push-only (no on-demand pull yet)

Bottom line

Pick API3 when first-party data + oev recapture matters most; pick Chronicle when lowest gas cost in the market (≈63% cheaper than chainlink on ethereum), with a strong rwa / institutional focus matters more.