RedStone (Modular oracle that ships new LST, LRT and RWA feeds faster than anyone) versus Pyth Network (Low-latency pull oracle sourced straight from 120+ first-party trading firms and exchanges) — how they differ on type, coverage and what they’re built for.
| RedStone | Pyth Network | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Push + Pull | Pull |
| Update model | Pull-first modular design: data is signed off-chain and delivered on-demand, or pushed on a schedule — pick per use case. | Publishers stream prices to Pythnet → relayed via Wormhole → pulled on-demand by the consuming chain. Updates ≈ every 400 ms. |
| Chains | 100+ | 90+ |
| Feeds | 1,000+ | 1,300+ |
| Security | Signed data packages verified on-chain; modular delivery across EVM and cross-chain. | Aggregates 120+ first-party publishers (exchanges, market makers) on Pythnet with confidence intervals. |
| TVS* | ~$3.6B | ~$3.1B |
| Token | RED | PYTH |
| Best at | Yield-bearing collateral — the go-to oracle for liquid staking (LST) and liquid restaking (LRT) tokens | HFT-grade latency and real-world assets (equities/FX/commodities); pull means you only pay gas when you read |
* Approximate total value secured — dated market snapshot (DefiLlama / provider reports, 2026).
Pick RedStone when yield-bearing collateral matters most; pick Pyth Network when hft-grade latency and real-world assets (equities/fx/commodities); pull means you only pay gas when you read matters more.