oracles.ink

Switchboard vs Chronicle

Switchboard (Permissionless, fully customizable pull oracle (Solana-born, now multichain)) versus Chronicle (Gas-efficient, fully verifiable oracle born inside MakerDAO ) — how they differ on type, coverage and what they’re built for.

SwitchboardChronicle
TypePullPush
Update modelSwitchboard On-Demand: anyone can define any feed permissionlessly, validated inside a TEE for tamper-resistance.Scribe: Schnorr signature aggregation decouples validator count from verification cost, so updates stay cheap as the validator set grows.
ChainsSolana + EVM/L2Ethereum + L2s
FeedsCustom / any160+
SecurityTEE-based execution (Switchboard On-Demand) with on-chain verification.Transparent validator set with cryptographic (Schnorr) aggregation; every update is independently verifiable.
TVS*Emerging on EVM~$7.5B
Token
Best atPermissionless custom feeds — list any asset without waiting for the provider to support itLowest gas cost in the market (≈63% cheaper than Chainlink on Ethereum), with a strong RWA / institutional focus

* Approximate total value secured — dated market snapshot (DefiLlama / provider reports, 2026).

Switchboard

  • Any custom feed, permissionlessly
  • Fast pull updates
  • TEE-based tamper resistance
  • Solana-rooted brand
  • Smaller EVM/L2 footprint today

Chronicle

  • Cheapest on-chain updates (Schnorr aggregation)
  • Fully transparent and verifiable
  • Institutional pedigree (Maker/Sky)
  • Smaller feed catalogue than Chainlink/Pyth
  • Push-only (no on-demand pull yet)

Bottom line

Pick Switchboard when permissionless custom feeds matters most; pick Chronicle when lowest gas cost in the market (≈63% cheaper than chainlink on ethereum), with a strong rwa / institutional focus matters more.